Mullvad (founded 2009, Sweden, Amagicom AB founder-owned) is the only major VPN with no affiliate programme and no email required to sign up — VPN Atlas earns nothing from recommending it. NordVPN (founded 2012, Panama, Nord Security group) has had its no-logs policy independently verified six times, most recently by Deloitte in December 2025. Both are independently audited and open-source. The honest difference is commercial model and jurisdiction — neither is universally better.
VPN comparison
Mullvad vs NordVPN: An Honest Comparison
By Editorial Team · Last updated 25 June 2026
Mullvad vs NordVPN: the verified facts
| VPN | Trust & certifications | pricing | money-back | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mullvad Since 2009 | Open-source stack; repeated independent security audits | — | — | |
| NordVPN Since 2012 | Independent no-logs audit (Deloitte, 2025) | — | — |
Only fields we can verify (certifications, confirmed specs, launch year) are shown.
How do they compare on the facts?
Mullvad was founded in 2009 and is based in Sweden, which sits inside the 14 Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance. It is owned by Amagicom AB — a founder-owned company with no venture capital or corporate group ownership. Its software stack is fully open-source and has been audited repeatedly by independent firms covering the WireGuard implementation, GotaTun protocol, and web application. The defining structural feature is that Mullvad requires no email address to create an account: users receive an anonymous account number and pay a flat monthly rate. Mullvad runs no affiliate programme — it is included here on editorial merit alone, and VPN Atlas earns nothing from listing it.
NordVPN was founded in 2012 and operates under Panama jurisdiction via the Nord Security group, which also owns Surfshark. Panama sits outside the 5/9/14 Eyes surveillance frameworks. NordVPN's no-logs policy has been independently verified six times across multiple audit firms, with the most recently disclosed engagement by Deloitte in December 2025. That audit depth — six engagements, most recent from a globally recognised firm — is unusual in the category. Nord Security's dual-brand structure (NordVPN and Surfshark sharing a parent) is worth noting if ownership concentration is a concern.
Who suits whom?
Mullvad is the stronger fit for users who treat data minimisation as the highest priority. The no-email sign-up means the provider holds no personal data about who you are — only an account number. Its flat monthly rate removes incentive pricing, and the absence of an affiliate programme means its recommendations from any publisher (including this one) are not incentivised. The Sweden jurisdiction is inside 14 Eyes, which some users weigh negatively, though no VPN provider faces mandatory data-retention obligations in Sweden at time of writing. For technically inclined users who want to inspect the open-source code and audit history directly, Mullvad's published audits and fully open stack are among the easiest to verify.
NordVPN suits users who want named-firm audit depth and a non-14-Eyes jurisdiction combined. Six independent no-logs engagements — culminating in the Deloitte December 2025 report — represent an unusually thorough accountability record that sits alongside Panama's structural privacy advantage. NordVPN's commercial model includes an affiliate programme (this site earns nothing from either listing today, but may in future — see disclosure) and has the resource investment that a large commercial operation allows. If the breadth of audit history from recognised firms is your primary trust signal, NordVPN has the deeper record.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for privacy, Mullvad or NordVPN?
Both are credible privacy choices with independently audited no-logs policies and open-source software. The meaningful difference is structural: Mullvad requires no email address, issues anonymous account numbers, and runs no affiliate programme — the minimum personal-data footprint of any major VPN. NordVPN has the deeper named-firm audit trail (six engagements, Deloitte December 2025) and a Panama jurisdiction outside 14 Eyes, but operates a large commercial business. If data minimisation and no-email sign-up matter most, Mullvad. If audit depth and non-14-Eyes jurisdiction are the priority, NordVPN.
Does Mullvad have an affiliate programme?
No. Mullvad explicitly runs no affiliate programme by policy. That means every publisher — including VPN Atlas — earns nothing from recommending it. We include Mullvad on editorial merit alone: its open-source, independently audited, anonymous-account model puts it among the most privacy-consistent services in this category, and covering it without an incentive is the honest thing to do.
Which has the better jurisdiction, Mullvad or NordVPN?
NordVPN's Panama jurisdiction sits outside the 5/9/14 Eyes alliances, which is typically considered a stronger position than Mullvad's Sweden, which is inside the 14 Eyes. However, Sweden does not have mandatory data-retention laws for VPN providers at time of writing, and Mullvad's no-email, anonymous-account model means there is minimal personal data to hand over regardless. Jurisdiction is one factor; what data actually exists is equally important.
Related